Tom just keep trying to convince yourself you're smarter than me.
First as quoted in the affidavit: " Trayvon Martin was temporarily living in the Retreat at Twin Lakes" even faust was intelligent enough after he read it not to comment on why the kid was walking around a gate community.
Second "Martin was unarmed and was not committing a crime". Gee, for people like you verb, I guess just being black and walking around an rich neighborhood is a crime in itself.
Third "Zimmerman felt Martin did not belong in the gated community and called the police" about the only thing he did right as a neighborhood watch commander.
Fourth "The police dispatcher informed Zimmerman that an officer was on the way and to wait for the officer" If Zimmerman had listened to the dispatcher, we would not be having this discussion now.
Fifth "During the recorded call Zimmerman made reference to people he felt had committed and gotten away with break-ins in his neighborhood. Later while talking about Martin, Zimmerman stated "these *******s, they always get away" and also said "these ****ing punks" And in what official capacity did Zimmerman have to take it upon himself to go after Martin?
Sixth "Zimmerman confronted Martin and a struggle ensued" Don't know how the prosecutor would have known who confronted whom but remember Zimmerman did speak with the prosecutor against his attorney's instructions, (guy must be as dense as you verb), so and I am assuming here, he told the prosecutor that he confronted Martin.
So verb, if you would have read the affidavit you would have possibly comprehended that the prosecutor has more than eyewitness testimony to file charges. But I do realize that reading and comprehension is an oxymoron when speaking about you.
I do not have a problem with the SYG law and if you whiny asses want your guns so you can feel safe driving around in hooterville, then go for it. This case does not merit any protection from the SYG law. Please explain why it should when by all evidence, Zimmerman provoked the situation.
No doubt about it Verb . . . Zimmerman had the right to kill this sucker, since he was the one attacked. Hell they would not even take it to a grand jury for murder one, because the prosecutor would not have received the glory or the public eye to further her career. Zimmerman will walk he has the best defense around, he is in a SYG state, where only about 20+ out of over 200 cases have been turned over, based upon the statistics he has a 90% chance of winning the case, unless it is thrown out before they go to trial.
Why is it the FEDS are not involved? There was no hate crime, that is why! Why was it not referred to a grand jury, because they would have exonerated Zimmerman. If there is no hate crime, and Zimmerman was attacked first, this case is history. Plus . . . Zimmerman cannot be sued for civil damages by this nimrods family. I think Zimmerman did the right thing, he had the right not to have to run away, or take a beating after being attacked, it does not matter if he was following this joker, the issue is who attacked who. It appears we have on living witness who will testify and that is Zimmerman.