Washington’s Insouciance Has No Rival
Is Obama a hypocrite or merely insouciant? Or is he an idiot?
According to news reports Obama’s White House meeting on Valentine’s day with China’s Vice President, Xi Jinping, provided an opportunity for Obama to raise “a sensitive human rights issue with the Chinese leader-in-waiting.” The brave and forthright Obama didn’t let etiquette or decorum get in his way. Afterwards, Obama declared that Washington would “continue to emphasize what we believe is the importance of realizing the aspirations and rights of all people.”
Think about that for a minute. Washington is now in the second decade of murdering Muslim men, women, and children in six countries. Washington is so concerned with human rights that it drops bombs on schools, hospitals, weddings and funerals, all in order to uphold the human rights of Muslim people. You see, bombing liberates Muslim women from having to wear the burka and from male domination.
One hundred thousand, or one million, dead Iraqis, four million displaced Iraqis, a country with destroyed infrastructure, and entire cities, such as Fallujah, bombed and burnt with white phosphorus into cinders is the proper way to show concern for human rights.
Ditto for Afghanistan. And Libya.
In Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia Washington’s drones bring human rights to the people.
Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, and secret CIA prison sites are other places to which Washington brings human rights. Obama, who has the power to murder American citizens without due process of law, is too powerless to close Guantanamo Prison.
He is powerless to prevent himself from supplying Israel with weapons with which to murder Palestinians and Lebanese citizens to whom Obama brings human rights by vetoing every UN resolution passed against Israel for its crimes against humanity.
Instead of following Washington’s human rights lead, the evil Chinese invest in other countries, buy things from them, and sell them goods.
Has any foreign dignitary ever raised “a sensitive human rights issue” with Obama or his predecessor? How is the world so deranged that Washington can murder innocents for years on end and still profess to be the world’s defender of human rights?
How many people has China bombed, droned, and sanctioned into non-existence in the 21st century?
Will Syria and Iran be the next victims of Washington’s concern for human rights?
Nothing better illustrates the total unreality of life in the West than the fact that the entire Western world did not break out in riotous laughter over Obama’s expression of his human rights concern over China’s behavior.
Washington’s concern with human rights does not extend as far as airport security where little girls and grandmothers are sexually groped. Antiwar activists have their homes invaded, their personal possessions carried off, and a grand jury is summoned to frame them up on some terrorist charge. US soldier Bradley Manning is held for two years in violation of the US Constitution while the human rights government concocts fabricated charges to punish him for revealing a US war crime. WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange is harassed endlessly with the goal of bringing him into the human rights clutches of Washington. Critics of Washington’s inhumane policies are monitored and spied upon.
Washington is the worst violator of human rights in our era, and Washington has only begun.
Who will liberate Americans from Washington’s clutches?
- Paul Craig Roberts
The greatest threat of islam is, it is a religion with a defiant tollerance to evil/vices, to gambling (insurance) (borrowing of Money), prostitution (abortion) , alcohol, drug abuse, or vices that put anything in front of God.
Christian religions have always had, dispite Mfsmans denial to , "what ever" to these evils, islamic does not.
A great comparison is, the Islamic religion is extremely "disciplined" to put nothing infront of God, yet the Christian religion calls for the same, but yet falls back to a "what ever" syndrom of faith in God.
The US is founded on a Christian based faith, yet the Christian faith has been "reformed" away from this central foundation of the one True God, to a "whatever" in putting God first, and now calls the same of its people and leaders.
History books written over a hundrend years ago, recognized this comparison between Islamic "disciplined" and the Christians "whatever" towards God. When God, is the ONLY single reason for religion, then it makes quit the difference in, what religion calls for. and with that, it was seen that the Islamic, held high standards to avoid vices, while the Christians said, what ever, the two civilizations experienced totally different levels of addictions and social challenges.
Thats why people left Europe, the Christian guided system, escaping for what they saw as Freedom, but they didnt know, the difference between false and real Freedom in the first place.
Corruption is the result of the people, themselves, not holding themselves to a moral standard. Christian freedom calls for it, but whatever, over takes and comes to be the standard of discipline.
What is worth fighting for, what is worth giving all, life and land for, is a great question. Many sects, though they were Christian,found nothing worth fighting for, so they left Europe, and came to America, for freedom.
and today, they are part of a civilization that is off in wars, but, nothing is worth fighting for, or what is worth fighting for still isnt answered.
What ever, INSOUCIANCE, is what reform made religion, and why the people dont see any reason to stand against evil, or corruption, nor demand discipline of its leaders that should set a standard to follow.
Islamic dont stand for, insouciance, because that, alows for putting something in front, of God.
A good example is, the People in the US have no reason to dictate to the Iran people, how to live to live today. but Insouciane explains why the people, dont even recognize or question such today. And basicly, many want it that way, as it gives them a free reign for the Government/Military to interfer in Iran, and try to manipulate economics, people and governments.
To pilfer other nations of their resources, OIL, by miitary force, becasue the people in the US dont hold their government responsible, by, Insouciance of the civilization.
thanks for bringing the word insouciance up, or dont, condon, whatever as soo many do..
Sloath is one of the Seven deadly sins, of Religion, Christian, that of putting nothing in front of God issue. Sloath, being lazy of heart, is being, insouciant towards others, but more so of a civilization alowing themselves to lead by leaders that act and are insouciant in their laws and actions. While the people are insouciant themselves, not only in their standards of themselves, but in those they alow to lead them. Christianity, reformed, alows for this what ever,, we say, Islam does not as a religion
thats why people are brainwashed to "hate/dispise" islam, for those in charge dont want to be held accountable, and a insouciant civilization doesnt..
Last edited by joe_alzado; 02-16-2012 at 09:48 AM.